tony/CHORUS
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 10 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Phase 2: Implement Execution Environment Abstraction (v0.3.0)

Browse Source 
This commit implements Phase 2 of the CHORUS Task Execution Engine development plan,
providing a comprehensive execution environment abstraction layer with Docker
container sandboxing support.

## New Features

### Core Sandbox Interface
- Comprehensive ExecutionSandbox interface with isolated task execution
- Support for command execution, file I/O, environment management
- Resource usage monitoring and sandbox lifecycle management
- Standardized error handling with SandboxError types and categories

### Docker Container Sandbox Implementation
- Full Docker API integration with secure container creation
- Transparent repository mounting with configurable read/write access
- Advanced security policies with capability dropping and privilege controls
- Comprehensive resource limits (CPU, memory, disk, processes, file handles)
- Support for tmpfs mounts, masked paths, and read-only bind mounts
- Container lifecycle management with proper cleanup and health monitoring

### Security & Resource Management
- Configurable security policies with SELinux, AppArmor, and Seccomp support
- Fine-grained capability management with secure defaults
- Network isolation options with configurable DNS and proxy settings
- Resource monitoring with real-time CPU, memory, and network usage tracking
- Comprehensive ulimits configuration for process and file handle limits

### Repository Integration
- Seamless repository mounting from local paths to container workspaces
- Git configuration support with user credentials and global settings
- File inclusion/exclusion patterns for selective repository access
- Configurable permissions and ownership for mounted repositories

### Testing Infrastructure
- Comprehensive test suite with 60+ test cases covering all functionality
- Docker integration tests with Alpine Linux containers (skipped in short mode)
- Mock sandbox implementation for unit testing without Docker dependencies
- Security policy validation tests with read-only filesystem enforcement
- Resource usage monitoring and cleanup verification tests

## Technical Details

### Dependencies Added
- github.com/docker/docker v28.4.0+incompatible - Docker API client
- github.com/docker/go-connections v0.6.0 - Docker connection utilities
- github.com/docker/go-units v0.5.0 - Docker units and formatting
- Associated Docker API dependencies for complete container management

### Architecture
- Interface-driven design enabling multiple sandbox implementations
- Comprehensive configuration structures for all sandbox aspects
- Resource usage tracking with detailed metrics collection
- Error handling with retryable error classification
- Proper cleanup and resource management throughout sandbox lifecycle

### Compatibility
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing CHORUS architecture
- Designed for future integration with Phase 3 Core Task Execution Engine
- Extensible design supporting additional sandbox implementations (VM, process)

This Phase 2 implementation provides the foundation for secure, isolated task
execution that will be integrated with the AI model providers from Phase 1
in the upcoming Phase 3 development.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
anthonyrawlins
2025-09-25 14:28:08 +10:00
parent d1252ade69
commit 8d9b62daf3
653 changed files with 88039 additions and 3766 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

114
vendor/github.com/distribution/reference/CONTRIBUTING.md generated vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
# Contributing to the reference library
## Community help
If you need help, please ask in the [#distribution](https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C01GVR8SY4R) channel on CNCF community slack.
[Click here for an invite to the CNCF community slack](https://slack.cncf.io/)
## Reporting security issues
The maintainers take security seriously. If you discover a security
issue, please bring it to their attention right away!
Please **DO NOT** file a public issue, instead send your report privately to
[cncf-distribution-security@lists.cncf.io](mailto:cncf-distribution-security@lists.cncf.io).
## Reporting an issue properly
By following these simple rules you will get better and faster feedback on your issue.
- search the bugtracker for an already reported issue
### If you found an issue that describes your problem:
- please read other user comments first, and confirm this is the same issue: a given error condition might be indicative of different problems - you may also find a workaround in the comments
- please refrain from adding "same thing here" or "+1" comments
- you don't need to comment on an issue to get notified of updates: just hit the "subscribe" button
- comment if you have some new, technical and relevant information to add to the case
- __DO NOT__ comment on closed issues or merged PRs. If you think you have a related problem, open up a new issue and reference the PR or issue.
### If you have not found an existing issue that describes your problem:
1. create a new issue, with a succinct title that describes your issue:
- bad title: "It doesn't work with my docker"
- good title: "Private registry push fail: 400 error with E_INVALID_DIGEST"
2. copy the output of (or similar for other container tools):
- `docker version`
- `docker info`
- `docker exec <registry-container> registry --version`
3. copy the command line you used to launch your Registry
4. restart your docker daemon in debug mode (add `-D` to the daemon launch arguments)
5. reproduce your problem and get your docker daemon logs showing the error
6. if relevant, copy your registry logs that show the error
7. provide any relevant detail about your specific Registry configuration (e.g., storage backend used)
8. indicate if you are using an enterprise proxy, Nginx, or anything else between you and your Registry
## Contributing Code
Contributions should be made via pull requests. Pull requests will be reviewed
by one or more maintainers or reviewers and merged when acceptable.
You should follow the basic GitHub workflow:
1. Use your own [fork](https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-forks)
2. Create your [change](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#successful-changes)
3. Test your code
4. [Commit](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages) your work, always [sign your commits](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages)
5. Push your change to your fork and create a [Pull Request](https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-from-a-fork)
Refer to [containerd's contribution guide](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#successful-changes)
for tips on creating a successful contribution.
## Sign your work
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the patch. Your
signature certifies that you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass
it on as an open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you can certify
the below (from [developercertificate.org](http://developercertificate.org/)):
```
Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1
Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
660 York Street, Suite 102,
San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
```
Then you just add a line to every git commit message:
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@email.com>
Use your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
If you set your `user.name` and `user.email` git configs, you can sign your
commit automatically with `git commit -s`.