Phase 2: Implement Execution Environment Abstraction (v0.3.0)
This commit implements Phase 2 of the CHORUS Task Execution Engine development plan, providing a comprehensive execution environment abstraction layer with Docker container sandboxing support. ## New Features ### Core Sandbox Interface - Comprehensive ExecutionSandbox interface with isolated task execution - Support for command execution, file I/O, environment management - Resource usage monitoring and sandbox lifecycle management - Standardized error handling with SandboxError types and categories ### Docker Container Sandbox Implementation - Full Docker API integration with secure container creation - Transparent repository mounting with configurable read/write access - Advanced security policies with capability dropping and privilege controls - Comprehensive resource limits (CPU, memory, disk, processes, file handles) - Support for tmpfs mounts, masked paths, and read-only bind mounts - Container lifecycle management with proper cleanup and health monitoring ### Security & Resource Management - Configurable security policies with SELinux, AppArmor, and Seccomp support - Fine-grained capability management with secure defaults - Network isolation options with configurable DNS and proxy settings - Resource monitoring with real-time CPU, memory, and network usage tracking - Comprehensive ulimits configuration for process and file handle limits ### Repository Integration - Seamless repository mounting from local paths to container workspaces - Git configuration support with user credentials and global settings - File inclusion/exclusion patterns for selective repository access - Configurable permissions and ownership for mounted repositories ### Testing Infrastructure - Comprehensive test suite with 60+ test cases covering all functionality - Docker integration tests with Alpine Linux containers (skipped in short mode) - Mock sandbox implementation for unit testing without Docker dependencies - Security policy validation tests with read-only filesystem enforcement - Resource usage monitoring and cleanup verification tests ## Technical Details ### Dependencies Added - github.com/docker/docker v28.4.0+incompatible - Docker API client - github.com/docker/go-connections v0.6.0 - Docker connection utilities - github.com/docker/go-units v0.5.0 - Docker units and formatting - Associated Docker API dependencies for complete container management ### Architecture - Interface-driven design enabling multiple sandbox implementations - Comprehensive configuration structures for all sandbox aspects - Resource usage tracking with detailed metrics collection - Error handling with retryable error classification - Proper cleanup and resource management throughout sandbox lifecycle ### Compatibility - Maintains backward compatibility with existing CHORUS architecture - Designed for future integration with Phase 3 Core Task Execution Engine - Extensible design supporting additional sandbox implementations (VM, process) This Phase 2 implementation provides the foundation for secure, isolated task execution that will be integrated with the AI model providers from Phase 1 in the upcoming Phase 3 development. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
227
vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/CONTRIBUTING.md
generated
vendored
227
vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/CONTRIBUTING.md
generated
vendored
@@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ git push <YOUR_FORK> <YOUR_BRANCH_NAME>
|
||||
Open a pull request against the main `opentelemetry-go` repo. Be sure to add the pull
|
||||
request ID to the entry you added to `CHANGELOG.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid rebasing and force-pushing to your branch to facilitate reviewing the pull request.
|
||||
Rewriting Git history makes it difficult to keep track of iterations during code review.
|
||||
All pull requests are squashed to a single commit upon merge to `main`.
|
||||
|
||||
### How to Receive Comments
|
||||
|
||||
* If the PR is not ready for review, please put `[WIP]` in the title,
|
||||
@@ -105,10 +109,9 @@ A PR is considered **ready to merge** when:
|
||||
|
||||
This is not enforced through automation, but needs to be validated by the
|
||||
maintainer merging.
|
||||
* The qualified approvals need to be from [Approver]s/[Maintainer]s
|
||||
affiliated with different companies. Two qualified approvals from
|
||||
[Approver]s or [Maintainer]s affiliated with the same company counts as a
|
||||
single qualified approval.
|
||||
* At least one of the qualified approvals need to be from an
|
||||
[Approver]/[Maintainer] affiliated with a different company than the author
|
||||
of the PR.
|
||||
* PRs introducing changes that have already been discussed and consensus
|
||||
reached only need one qualified approval. The discussion and resolution
|
||||
needs to be linked to the PR.
|
||||
@@ -177,25 +180,76 @@ patterns in the spec.
|
||||
For a deeper discussion, see
|
||||
[this](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/issues/165).
|
||||
|
||||
## Tests
|
||||
|
||||
Each functionality should be covered by tests.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance-critical functionality should also be covered by benchmarks.
|
||||
|
||||
- Pull requests adding a performance-critical functionality
|
||||
should have `go test -bench` output in their description.
|
||||
- Pull requests changing a performance-critical functionality
|
||||
should have [`benchstat`](https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat)
|
||||
output in their description.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
This project uses [Go Modules] for dependency management. All modules will use
|
||||
`go.mod` to explicitly list all direct and indirect dependencies, ensuring a
|
||||
clear dependency graph. The `go.sum` file for each module will be committed to
|
||||
the repository and used to verify the integrity of downloaded modules,
|
||||
preventing malicious tampering.
|
||||
|
||||
This project uses automated dependency update tools (i.e. dependabot,
|
||||
renovatebot) to manage updates to dependencies. This ensures that dependencies
|
||||
are kept up-to-date with the latest security patches and features and are
|
||||
reviewed before being merged. If you would like to propose a change to a
|
||||
dependency it should be done through a pull request that updates the `go.mod`
|
||||
file and includes a description of the change.
|
||||
|
||||
See the [versioning and compatibility](./VERSIONING.md) policy for more details
|
||||
about dependency compatibility.
|
||||
|
||||
[Go Modules]: https://pkg.go.dev/cmd/go#hdr-Modules__module_versions__and_more
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
This project does not partition dependencies based on the environment (i.e.
|
||||
`development`, `staging`, `production`).
|
||||
|
||||
Only the dependencies explicitly included in the released modules have be
|
||||
tested and verified to work with the released code. No other guarantee is made
|
||||
about the compatibility of other dependencies.
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
Each non-example Go Module should have its own `README.md` containing:
|
||||
Each (non-internal, non-test) package must be documented using
|
||||
[Go Doc Comments](https://go.dev/doc/comment),
|
||||
preferably in a `doc.go` file.
|
||||
|
||||
- A pkg.go.dev badge which can be generated [here](https://pkg.go.dev/badge/).
|
||||
- Brief description.
|
||||
- Installation instructions (and requirements if applicable).
|
||||
- Hyperlink to an example. Depending on the component the example can be:
|
||||
- An `example_test.go` like [here](exporters/stdout/stdouttrace/example_test.go).
|
||||
- A sample Go application with its own `README.md`, like [here](example/zipkin).
|
||||
- Additional documentation sections such us:
|
||||
- Configuration,
|
||||
- Contributing,
|
||||
- References.
|
||||
Prefer using [Examples](https://pkg.go.dev/testing#hdr-Examples)
|
||||
instead of putting code snippets in Go doc comments.
|
||||
In some cases, you can even create [Testable Examples](https://go.dev/blog/examples).
|
||||
|
||||
[Here](exporters/jaeger/README.md) is an example of a concise `README.md`.
|
||||
You can install and run a "local Go Doc site" in the following way:
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, it should be possible to navigate to any `README.md` from the
|
||||
root `README.md`.
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
go install golang.org/x/pkgsite/cmd/pkgsite@latest
|
||||
pkgsite
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
[`go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric`](https://pkg.go.dev/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric)
|
||||
is an example of a very well-documented package.
|
||||
|
||||
### README files
|
||||
|
||||
Each (non-internal, non-test, non-documentation) package must contain a
|
||||
`README.md` file containing at least a title, and a `pkg.go.dev` badge.
|
||||
|
||||
The README should not be a repetition of Go doc comments.
|
||||
|
||||
You can verify the presence of all README files with the `make verify-readmes`
|
||||
command.
|
||||
|
||||
## Style Guide
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -208,6 +262,10 @@ For a non-comprehensive but foundational overview of these best practices
|
||||
the [Effective Go](https://golang.org/doc/effective_go.html) documentation
|
||||
is an excellent starting place.
|
||||
|
||||
We also recommend following the
|
||||
[Go Code Review Comments](https://go.dev/wiki/CodeReviewComments)
|
||||
that collects common comments made during reviews of Go code.
|
||||
|
||||
As a convenience for developers building this project the `make precommit`
|
||||
will format, lint, validate, and in some cases fix the changes you plan to
|
||||
submit. This check will need to pass for your changes to be able to be
|
||||
@@ -475,8 +533,33 @@ documentation are allowed to be extended with additional methods.
|
||||
|
||||
> Warning: methods may be added to this interface in minor releases.
|
||||
|
||||
These interfaces are defined by the OpenTelemetry specification and will be
|
||||
updated as the specification evolves.
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, stable interfaces MUST NOT be modified.
|
||||
|
||||
#### How to Change Specification Interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
When an API change must be made, we will update the SDK with the new method one
|
||||
release before the API change. This will allow the SDK one version before the
|
||||
API change to work seamlessly with the new API.
|
||||
|
||||
If an incompatible version of the SDK is used with the new API the application
|
||||
will fail to compile.
|
||||
|
||||
#### How Not to Change Specification Interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
We have explored using a v2 of the API to change interfaces and found that there
|
||||
was no way to introduce a v2 and have it work seamlessly with the v1 of the API.
|
||||
Problems happened with libraries that upgraded to v2 when an application did not,
|
||||
and would not produce any telemetry.
|
||||
|
||||
More detail of the approaches considered and their limitations can be found in
|
||||
the [Use a V2 API to evolve interfaces](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/issues/3920)
|
||||
issue.
|
||||
|
||||
#### How to Change Other Interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
If new functionality is needed for an interface that cannot be changed it MUST
|
||||
be added by including an additional interface. That added interface can be a
|
||||
simple interface for the specific functionality that you want to add or it can
|
||||
@@ -531,32 +614,110 @@ functionality should be added, each one will need their own super-set
|
||||
interfaces and will duplicate the pattern. For this reason, the simple targeted
|
||||
interface that defines the specific functionality should be preferred.
|
||||
|
||||
See also:
|
||||
[Keeping Your Modules Compatible: Working with interfaces](https://go.dev/blog/module-compatibility#working-with-interfaces).
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing
|
||||
|
||||
We allow using [`testify`](https://github.com/stretchr/testify) even though
|
||||
it is seen as non-idiomatic according to
|
||||
the [Go Test Comments](https://go.dev/wiki/TestComments#assert-libraries) page.
|
||||
|
||||
The tests should never leak goroutines.
|
||||
|
||||
Use the term `ConcurrentSafe` in the test name when it aims to verify the
|
||||
absence of race conditions. The top-level tests with this term will be run
|
||||
many times in the `test-concurrent-safe` CI job to increase the chance of
|
||||
catching concurrency issues. This does not apply to subtests when this term
|
||||
is not in their root name.
|
||||
|
||||
### Internal packages
|
||||
|
||||
The use of internal packages should be scoped to a single module. A sub-module
|
||||
should never import from a parent internal package. This creates a coupling
|
||||
between the two modules where a user can upgrade the parent without the child
|
||||
and if the internal package API has changed it will fail to upgrade[^3].
|
||||
|
||||
There are two known exceptions to this rule:
|
||||
|
||||
- `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/internal/global`
|
||||
- This package manages global state for all of opentelemetry-go. It needs to
|
||||
be a single package in order to ensure the uniqueness of the global state.
|
||||
- `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/internal/baggage`
|
||||
- This package provides values in a `context.Context` that need to be
|
||||
recognized by `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/baggage` and
|
||||
`go.opentelemetry.io/otel/bridge/opentracing` but remain private.
|
||||
|
||||
If you have duplicate code in multiple modules, make that code into a Go
|
||||
template stored in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/internal/shared` and use [gotmpl]
|
||||
to render the templates in the desired locations. See [#4404] for an example of
|
||||
this.
|
||||
|
||||
[^3]: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/issues/3548
|
||||
|
||||
### Ignoring context cancellation
|
||||
|
||||
OpenTelemetry API implementations need to ignore the cancellation of the context that are
|
||||
passed when recording a value (e.g. starting a span, recording a measurement, emitting a log).
|
||||
Recording methods should not return an error describing the cancellation state of the context
|
||||
when they complete, nor should they abort any work.
|
||||
|
||||
This rule may not apply if the OpenTelemetry specification defines a timeout mechanism for
|
||||
the method. In that case the context cancellation can be used for the timeout with the
|
||||
restriction that this behavior is documented for the method. Otherwise, timeouts
|
||||
are expected to be handled by the user calling the API, not the implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Stoppage of the telemetry pipeline is handled by calling the appropriate `Shutdown` method
|
||||
of a provider. It is assumed the context passed from a user is not used for this purpose.
|
||||
|
||||
Outside of the direct recording of telemetry from the API (e.g. exporting telemetry,
|
||||
force flushing telemetry, shutting down a signal provider) the context cancellation
|
||||
should be honored. This means all work done on behalf of the user provided context
|
||||
should be canceled.
|
||||
|
||||
## Approvers and Maintainers
|
||||
|
||||
### Approvers
|
||||
|
||||
- [Evan Torrie](https://github.com/evantorrie), Verizon Media
|
||||
- [Sam Xie](https://github.com/XSAM), Cisco/AppDynamics
|
||||
- [David Ashpole](https://github.com/dashpole), Google
|
||||
- [Robert Pająk](https://github.com/pellared), Splunk
|
||||
- [Chester Cheung](https://github.com/hanyuancheung), Tencent
|
||||
- [Damien Mathieu](https://github.com/dmathieu), Elastic
|
||||
|
||||
### Maintainers
|
||||
|
||||
- [Aaron Clawson](https://github.com/MadVikingGod), LightStep
|
||||
- [Anthony Mirabella](https://github.com/Aneurysm9), AWS
|
||||
- [Tyler Yahn](https://github.com/MrAlias), Splunk
|
||||
- [Damien Mathieu](https://github.com/dmathieu), Elastic ([GPG](https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=5A126B972A81A6CE443E5E1B408B8E44F0873832))
|
||||
- [David Ashpole](https://github.com/dashpole), Google ([GPG](https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=C0D1BDDCAAEAE573673085F176327DA4D864DC70))
|
||||
- [Robert Pająk](https://github.com/pellared), Splunk ([GPG](https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=CDAD3A60476A3DE599AA5092E5F7C35A4DBE90C2))
|
||||
- [Sam Xie](https://github.com/XSAM), Splunk ([GPG](https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=AEA033782371ABB18EE39188B8044925D6FEEBEA))
|
||||
- [Tyler Yahn](https://github.com/MrAlias), Splunk ([GPG](https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=0x46B0F3E1A8B1BA5A))
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about the maintainer role, see the [community repository](https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/guides/contributor/membership.md#maintainer).
|
||||
|
||||
### Approvers
|
||||
|
||||
- [Flc](https://github.com/flc1125), Independent
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about the approver role, see the [community repository](https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/guides/contributor/membership.md#approver).
|
||||
|
||||
### Triagers
|
||||
|
||||
- [Alex Kats](https://github.com/akats7), Capital One
|
||||
- [Cheng-Zhen Yang](https://github.com/scorpionknifes), Independent
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about the triager role, see the [community repository](https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/guides/contributor/membership.md#triager).
|
||||
|
||||
### Emeritus
|
||||
|
||||
- [Gustavo Silva Paiva](https://github.com/paivagustavo), LightStep
|
||||
- [Josh MacDonald](https://github.com/jmacd), LightStep
|
||||
- [Aaron Clawson](https://github.com/MadVikingGod)
|
||||
- [Anthony Mirabella](https://github.com/Aneurysm9)
|
||||
- [Chester Cheung](https://github.com/hanyuancheung)
|
||||
- [Evan Torrie](https://github.com/evantorrie)
|
||||
- [Gustavo Silva Paiva](https://github.com/paivagustavo)
|
||||
- [Josh MacDonald](https://github.com/jmacd)
|
||||
- [Liz Fong-Jones](https://github.com/lizthegrey)
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about the emeritus role, see the [community repository](https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/guides/contributor/membership.md#emeritus-maintainerapprovertriager).
|
||||
|
||||
### Become an Approver or a Maintainer
|
||||
|
||||
See the [community membership document in OpenTelemetry community
|
||||
repo](https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/community-membership.md).
|
||||
repo](https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/guides/contributor/membership.md).
|
||||
|
||||
[Approver]: #approvers
|
||||
[Maintainer]: #maintainers
|
||||
[gotmpl]: https://pkg.go.dev/go.opentelemetry.io/build-tools/gotmpl
|
||||
[#4404]: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/pull/4404
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user