#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Advanced Meta Discussion Demo for Bzzz P2P Mesh Shows cross-repository coordination and dependency detection """ import json import time from datetime import datetime def demo_cross_repository_coordination(): """Demonstrate advanced meta discussion features""" print("🎯 ADVANCED BZZZ META DISCUSSION DEMO") print("=" * 60) print("Scenario: Multi-repository microservices coordination") print() # Simulate multiple repositories in the system repositories = { "api-gateway": { "agent": "walnut-12345", "capabilities": ["code-generation", "api-design", "security"], "current_task": { "id": 42, "title": "Implement OAuth2 authentication flow", "description": "Add OAuth2 support to API gateway with JWT tokens", "labels": ["security", "api", "authentication"] } }, "user-service": { "agent": "acacia-67890", "capabilities": ["code-analysis", "database", "microservices"], "current_task": { "id": 87, "title": "Update user schema for OAuth integration", "description": "Add OAuth provider fields to user table", "labels": ["database", "schema", "authentication"] } }, "notification-service": { "agent": "ironwood-54321", "capabilities": ["advanced-reasoning", "integration", "messaging"], "current_task": { "id": 156, "title": "Secure webhook endpoints with JWT", "description": "Validate JWT tokens on webhook endpoints", "labels": ["security", "webhook", "authentication"] } } } print("📋 ACTIVE TASKS ACROSS REPOSITORIES:") for repo, info in repositories.items(): task = info["current_task"] print(f" 🔧 {repo}: #{task['id']} - {task['title']}") print(f" Agent: {info['agent']} | Labels: {', '.join(task['labels'])}") print() # Demo 1: Dependency Detection print("🔍 PHASE 1: DEPENDENCY DETECTION") print("-" * 40) dependencies = [ { "task1": "api-gateway/#42", "task2": "user-service/#87", "relationship": "API_Contract", "reason": "OAuth implementation requires coordinated schema changes", "confidence": 0.9 }, { "task1": "api-gateway/#42", "task2": "notification-service/#156", "relationship": "Security_Compliance", "reason": "Both implement JWT token validation", "confidence": 0.85 } ] for dep in dependencies: print(f"🔗 DEPENDENCY DETECTED:") print(f" {dep['task1']} ↔ {dep['task2']}") print(f" Type: {dep['relationship']} (confidence: {dep['confidence']})") print(f" Reason: {dep['reason']}") print() # Demo 2: Coordination Session Creation print("🎯 PHASE 2: COORDINATION SESSION INITIATED") print("-" * 40) session_id = f"coord_oauth_{int(time.time())}" print(f"📝 Session ID: {session_id}") print(f"📅 Created: {datetime.now().strftime('%H:%M:%S')}") print(f"👥 Participants: walnut-12345, acacia-67890, ironwood-54321") print() # Demo 3: AI-Generated Coordination Plan print("🤖 PHASE 3: AI-GENERATED COORDINATION PLAN") print("-" * 40) coordination_plan = """ COORDINATION PLAN: OAuth2 Implementation Across Services 1. EXECUTION ORDER: - Phase 1: user-service (schema changes) - Phase 2: api-gateway (OAuth implementation) - Phase 3: notification-service (JWT validation) 2. SHARED ARTIFACTS: - JWT token format specification - OAuth2 endpoint documentation - Database schema migration scripts - Shared security configuration 3. COORDINATION REQUIREMENTS: - walnut-12345: Define JWT token structure before implementation - acacia-67890: Migrate user schema first, share field mappings - ironwood-54321: Wait for JWT format, implement validation 4. POTENTIAL CONFLICTS: - JWT payload structure disagreements - Token expiration time mismatches - Security scope definition conflicts 5. SUCCESS CRITERIA: - All services use consistent JWT format - OAuth flow works end-to-end - Security audit passes on all endpoints - Integration tests pass across all services """ print(coordination_plan) # Demo 4: Agent Coordination Messages print("💬 PHASE 4: AGENT COORDINATION MESSAGES") print("-" * 40) messages = [ { "timestamp": "14:32:01", "from": "walnut-12345 (api-gateway)", "type": "proposal", "content": "I propose using RS256 JWT tokens with 15min expiry. Standard claims: sub, iat, exp, scope." }, { "timestamp": "14:32:45", "from": "acacia-67890 (user-service)", "type": "question", "content": "Should we store the OAuth provider info in the user table or separate table? Also need refresh token strategy." }, { "timestamp": "14:33:20", "from": "ironwood-54321 (notification-service)", "type": "agreement", "content": "RS256 sounds good. For webhooks, I'll validate signature and check 'webhook' scope. Need the public key endpoint." }, { "timestamp": "14:34:10", "from": "walnut-12345 (api-gateway)", "type": "response", "content": "Separate oauth_providers table is better for multiple providers. Public key at /.well-known/jwks.json" }, { "timestamp": "14:34:55", "from": "acacia-67890 (user-service)", "type": "agreement", "content": "Agreed on separate table. I'll create migration script and share the schema. ETA: 2 hours." } ] for msg in messages: print(f"[{msg['timestamp']}] {msg['from']} ({msg['type']}):") print(f" {msg['content']}") print() # Demo 5: Automatic Resolution Detection print("✅ PHASE 5: COORDINATION RESOLUTION") print("-" * 40) print("🔍 ANALYSIS: Consensus detected") print(" - All agents agreed on JWT format (RS256)") print(" - Database strategy decided (separate oauth_providers table)") print(" - Public key endpoint established (/.well-known/jwks.json)") print(" - Implementation order confirmed") print() print("📋 COORDINATION COMPLETE:") print(" - Session status: RESOLVED") print(" - Resolution: Consensus reached on OAuth implementation") print(" - Next steps: acacia-67890 starts schema migration") print(" - Dependencies: walnut-12345 waits for schema completion") print() # Demo 6: Alternative - Escalation Scenario print("🚨 ALTERNATIVE: ESCALATION SCENARIO") print("-" * 40) escalation_scenario = """ ESCALATION TRIGGERED: Security Implementation Conflict Reason: Agents cannot agree on JWT token expiration time - walnut-12345 wants 15 minutes (high security) - acacia-67890 wants 4 hours (user experience) - ironwood-54321 wants 1 hour (compromise) Messages exceeded threshold: 12 messages without consensus Human expert summoned via N8N webhook to deepblack.cloud Escalation webhook payload: { "session_id": "coord_oauth_1752401234", "conflict_type": "security_policy_disagreement", "agents_involved": ["walnut-12345", "acacia-67890", "ironwood-54321"], "repositories": ["api-gateway", "user-service", "notification-service"], "issue_summary": "JWT expiration time conflict preventing OAuth implementation", "requires_human_decision": true, "urgency": "medium" } """ print(escalation_scenario) # Demo 7: System Capabilities Summary print("🎯 ADVANCED META DISCUSSION CAPABILITIES") print("-" * 40) capabilities = [ "✅ Cross-repository dependency detection", "✅ Intelligent task relationship analysis", "✅ AI-generated coordination plans", "✅ Multi-agent conversation management", "✅ Consensus detection and resolution", "✅ Automatic escalation to humans", "✅ Session lifecycle management", "✅ Hop-limited message propagation", "✅ Custom dependency rules", "✅ Project-aware coordination" ] for cap in capabilities: print(f" {cap}") print() print("🚀 PRODUCTION READY:") print(" - P2P mesh infrastructure: ✅ Deployed") print(" - Antennae meta-discussion: ✅ Active") print(" - Dependency detection: ✅ Implemented") print(" - Coordination sessions: ✅ Functional") print(" - Human escalation: ✅ N8N integrated") print() print("🎯 Ready for real cross-repository coordination!") if __name__ == "__main__": demo_cross_repository_coordination()