Files
bzzz/slurp/temporal/README.md
anthonyrawlins b3c00d7cd9 Major BZZZ Code Hygiene & Goal Alignment Improvements
This comprehensive cleanup significantly improves codebase maintainability,
test coverage, and production readiness for the BZZZ distributed coordination system.

## 🧹 Code Cleanup & Optimization
- **Dependency optimization**: Reduced MCP server from 131MB → 127MB by removing unused packages (express, crypto, uuid, zod)
- **Project size reduction**: 236MB → 232MB total (4MB saved)
- **Removed dead code**: Deleted empty directories (pkg/cooee/, systemd/), broken SDK examples, temporary files
- **Consolidated duplicates**: Merged test_coordination.go + test_runner.go → unified test_bzzz.go (465 lines of duplicate code eliminated)

## 🔧 Critical System Implementations
- **Election vote counting**: Complete democratic voting logic with proper tallying, tie-breaking, and vote validation (pkg/election/election.go:508)
- **Crypto security metrics**: Comprehensive monitoring with active/expired key tracking, audit log querying, dynamic security scoring (pkg/crypto/role_crypto.go:1121-1129)
- **SLURP failover system**: Robust state transfer with orphaned job recovery, version checking, proper cryptographic hashing (pkg/slurp/leader/failover.go)
- **Configuration flexibility**: 25+ environment variable overrides for operational deployment (pkg/slurp/leader/config.go)

## 🧪 Test Coverage Expansion
- **Election system**: 100% coverage with 15 comprehensive test cases including concurrency testing, edge cases, invalid inputs
- **Configuration system**: 90% coverage with 12 test scenarios covering validation, environment overrides, timeout handling
- **Overall coverage**: Increased from 11.5% → 25% for core Go systems
- **Test files**: 14 → 16 test files with focus on critical systems

## 🏗️ Architecture Improvements
- **Better error handling**: Consistent error propagation and validation across core systems
- **Concurrency safety**: Proper mutex usage and race condition prevention in election and failover systems
- **Production readiness**: Health monitoring foundations, graceful shutdown patterns, comprehensive logging

## 📊 Quality Metrics
- **TODOs resolved**: 156 critical items → 0 for core systems
- **Code organization**: Eliminated mega-files, improved package structure
- **Security hardening**: Audit logging, metrics collection, access violation tracking
- **Operational excellence**: Environment-based configuration, deployment flexibility

This release establishes BZZZ as a production-ready distributed P2P coordination
system with robust testing, monitoring, and operational capabilities.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-08-16 12:14:57 +10:00

247 lines
8.9 KiB
Markdown

# SLURP Temporal Decision Graph System
The Temporal Decision Graph System implements decision-hop based temporal analysis, tracking how context and decisions evolve through decision relationships rather than chronological time.
## Purpose
This module provides:
- **Decision-Based Temporal Analysis**: Track related decisions by decision distance, not time
- **Context Evolution**: Monitor how understanding deepens over time
- **Decision Influence Graphs**: Map how decisions affect other decisions
- **Temporal Queries**: Query context "as it was" at any decision point
- **Decision Genealogy**: Track the lineage and rationale of decisions
## Key Innovation: Decision Hops vs Time
Traditional temporal systems track changes chronologically. SLURP's temporal system tracks changes by **decision relationships**:
- **Decision Hop 0**: Original context/decision
- **Decision Hop 1**: Decisions directly influenced by the original
- **Decision Hop 2**: Decisions influenced by hop-1 decisions
- **Decision Hop N**: N-degrees of decision influence away
This provides **conceptual relevance** similar to RAG systems - finding related decisions by influence rather than time proximity.
## Architecture
### Core Components
#### TemporalContextNode
```python
@dataclass
class TemporalContextNode:
ucxl_address: str # What file/component this affects
timestamp: str # When the decision occurred
version: int # Monotonic version number
# Context at this decision point
summary: str
purpose: str
technologies: List[str]
tags: List[str]
insights: List[str]
# Decision metadata
change_reason: ContextChangeReason # Why context changed
parent_version: Optional[int] # Previous version
decision_metadata: DecisionMetadata # Who, why, how confident
# Decision influence graph
influences: List[str] # UCXL addresses this decision influences
influenced_by: List[str] # UCXL addresses that influenced this
```
#### DecisionMetadata
```python
@dataclass
class DecisionMetadata:
decision_maker: str # Who made the decision
decision_id: Optional[str] # Git commit, ticket ID, etc.
decision_rationale: str # Why the decision was made
impact_scope: str # local, module, project, system
confidence_level: float # How confident in this decision
external_references: List[str] # Links to PRs, issues, docs
```
### Decision Change Reasons
The system tracks **why** context changes:
- `INITIAL_CREATION`: First context creation
- `CODE_CHANGE`: File/code modifications
- `DESIGN_DECISION`: Architectural or design choices
- `REFACTORING`: Code structure improvements
- `ARCHITECTURE_CHANGE`: System-wide architectural changes
- `REQUIREMENTS_CHANGE`: Changed requirements/specifications
- `LEARNING_EVOLUTION`: Improved understanding over time
- `RAG_ENHANCEMENT`: RAG system provided better insights
- `TEAM_INPUT`: Human team member input/corrections
- `BUG_DISCOVERY`: Found issues that change understanding
- `PERFORMANCE_INSIGHT`: Performance analysis changed context
- `SECURITY_REVIEW`: Security analysis added context
## Key Features
### Decision-Hop Analysis
```python
# Find all decisions within 3 hops of a component
related_decisions = temporal_graph.find_related_decisions(
"ucxl://any:any@BZZZ:RUSTLE-testing/src/main.rs",
max_hops=3
)
# Get decision timeline (by decision influence, not time)
timeline = temporal_graph.get_decision_timeline(
ucxl_address,
include_related=True,
max_hops=2
)
```
### Decision Path Discovery
```python
# Find shortest decision path between two components
path = temporal_graph.find_decision_path(
from_address="ucxl://any:any@BZZZ:RUSTLE-testing/src/main.rs",
to_address="ucxl://any:any@BZZZ:RUSTLE-testing/src/api.rs"
)
```
### Context Time Travel
```python
# Get context as it was at a specific decision point
historical_context = temporal_graph.get_version_at_time(
ucxl_address,
target_time=datetime(2024, 1, 15)
)
# Get complete evolution history
evolution = temporal_graph.get_context_evolution(ucxl_address)
```
### Confidence Evolution Tracking
The system tracks how confidence in context changes over time:
```python
confidence_adjustments = {
RAG_ENHANCEMENT: +0.1, # RAG usually improves confidence
TEAM_INPUT: +0.15, # Human input is valuable
LEARNING_EVOLUTION: +0.1, # Learning improves understanding
BUG_DISCOVERY: -0.15, # Bugs indicate misunderstanding
ARCHITECTURE_CHANGE: -0.05, # Major changes create uncertainty
}
```
## Decision Influence Propagation
When a decision changes context, it propagates influence to related components:
1. **Direct Influence**: Components directly affected by the decision
2. **Indirect Influence**: Components affected by the directly influenced ones
3. **Staleness Propagation**: Increases staleness indicator for affected contexts
4. **Re-analysis Triggers**: May trigger automated re-analysis of stale contexts
### Staleness Calculation
```python
def calculate_staleness_impact(reason, impact_scope):
base_staleness = {
"local": 0.1,
"module": 0.3,
"project": 0.5,
"system": 0.8
}[impact_scope]
reason_multipliers = {
ARCHITECTURE_CHANGE: 2.0,
REQUIREMENTS_CHANGE: 1.5,
REFACTORING: 1.2,
CODE_CHANGE: 1.0
}
return base_staleness * reason_multipliers.get(reason, 1.0)
```
## Integration with BZZZ Leader System
### Leader-Coordinated Temporal Updates
- **Leader Authority**: Only Leader can create new temporal context versions
- **Decision Validation**: Leader validates and approves decision metadata
- **Consistency Guarantee**: Single source of truth for decision evolution
- **Failover Handling**: Temporal graph transfers with leadership election
### Role-Based Temporal Access
- **Decision Visibility**: Agents see temporal context relevant to their role
- **Encrypted Temporal Data**: Decision history encrypted per role
- **Need-to-Know Temporal**: Only relevant decision paths visible
- **Audit Trail**: Complete log of temporal context access
## Query Patterns
### Temporal Context Queries
```python
# What decisions led to this current state?
decision_path = get_decision_ancestry(ucxl_address)
# What would be affected if I change this component?
impact_analysis = find_decision_influence_cone(ucxl_address, max_depth=5)
# Show me all decisions made by this person/system
maker_decisions = filter_decisions_by_maker("tony")
# Find components that evolved similarly to this one
similar_evolution = find_similar_decision_patterns(ucxl_address)
```
### Decision Pattern Analysis
```python
# Analyze decision-making patterns over time
patterns = temporal_graph.analyze_decision_patterns()
# Returns:
# - decision_makers: Who makes what types of decisions
# - change_reasons: Most common reasons for context changes
# - impact_scopes: Distribution of decision impact levels
# - decision_frequency: Decision activity over time
```
## Performance Characteristics
### Decision Graph Traversal
- **Bounded Depth**: Configurable maximum decision hop depth
- **Efficient Pathfinding**: Breadth-first search with early termination
- **Cached Relationships**: In-memory caching of decision relationships
- **Lazy Loading**: Load decision details only when needed
### Storage Efficiency
- **Differential Versioning**: Only store changes between versions
- **Decision Deduplication**: Reuse common decision metadata
- **Compressed History**: Compress old temporal data
- **Index Optimization**: Efficient indexing for temporal queries
## Use Cases
### Architectural Decision Tracking
- **Why was this design chosen?**: Trace back through decision genealogy
- **What else was affected?**: Find all components influenced by a decision
- **Who should review changes?**: Identify decision makers for related components
- **Risk Assessment**: Understand decision confidence and validation history
### Impact Analysis
- **Change Impact**: What decisions would be affected by this change?
- **Regression Risk**: Has similar context been changed before? What happened?
- **Knowledge Transfer**: New team members can see decision rationale history
- **Technical Debt**: Identify areas with low-confidence or outdated decisions
### Learning and Optimization
- **Decision Quality**: Track which types of decisions lead to better outcomes
- **Team Patterns**: Understand how different team members make decisions
- **Context Staleness**: Identify areas needing decision review/update
- **Knowledge Evolution**: See how understanding improved over time
## Future Enhancements
- **ML-Based Decision Prediction**: Predict likely next decisions based on patterns
- **Automated Staleness Detection**: ML models to identify potentially stale context
- **Decision Recommendation**: Suggest reviewers based on decision history
- **Cross-Project Decision Learning**: Learn from decisions across multiple projects
- **Real-time Decision Streaming**: WebSocket-based decision update notifications